You
lift weights, eat healthy foods, and fit into your jeans. So why the
hell is your doctor telling you that you're at an unhealthy weight according to
the body mass index (BMI)?
Welp, BMI, once the gold standard
for assessing a person's weight—and overall longevity—has fallen out of favor.
And if you're trying to lose weight, having a BMI in the overweight or obesity
range, even if you're doing everything right, can be a huge downer.
So we're here to tell you that your BMI
calculation officially means nothing.
We've asked experts for the biggest reasons why
your BMI is totally off base and the best way to get a feel for how your health
measures up.
1. IT'S ANCIENT.
"BMI was created about 200 years ago as a way
to estimate obesity," says Leslie Cho, M.D., director of the Cleveland
Clinic Women's Cardiovascular Center. But it doesn't actually measure the fat
on your frame. It's literally a weight-to-height ratio, considering
no other factors (sex, bone density, race).
2. IT CONFUSES FIT WITH FAT.
Athlete? Have a lot of lean-muscle mass? You could still have
a BMI that qualifies as overweight or obese, even though you may be in great
shape. According to a 2016 study,
47 percent of people in the overweight BMI category—along with 29 percent
classified as obese—are actually healthy.
3.
IT CAN'T FULLY MEASURE HEALTH.
On the flip side, the same study
also found that more than 30 percent of people with so-called healthy BMIs have
too-high blood pressure, cholesterol, inflammation levels, or insulin
resistance, the hallmark of Type
2 diabetes. Those are all truer tests of your actual wellness.
The bottom
line: Waist circumference is a far better
gauge of your health. It may not consider things like ethnicity either, but
excessive abdominal fat is a universal red flag. For women, measurements of 35
inches or more (around the top of the hip bones) are consistently linked with
an increased risk for chronic disease. And if you're going to step on the
scale, choose one that calculates full body composition—i.e., your lean and fat
mass. Article Source
No comments:
Post a Comment